Southern California Law Review
Volume 72  
March 1999
 
Issue 3
 
  Judicial Independence and Accountability Symposium
  Foreword
    Scott H. Bice
     
  The Architecture of Judicial Independence
    Stephen B. Burbank
     
  Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence
    John Ferejohn
     
  Judges as Prophets: A Coverian Interpretation
    Ronald R. Garet
     
  Rodrigo's Committee Assignment: A Skeptical Look at Judicial Independence
    Richard Delgado
     
  Commentary
  Nonpromotion and Judicial Independence
    Daniel Klerman
     
  Article
  Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, and Case Selection: An Empirical Study
    John Blume & Theodore Eisenberg
     
  Some Realism about Electoralism: Rethinking Judicial Campaign Finance
    Kathryn Abrams
     
  Two Concepts of Judicial Independence
    Pamela S. Karlan
     
  Comment on Professors Karlan's and Abrahams' Structural Threats to Judicial Independence
    Robert S. Thompson
     
  Why the Japanese Taxpayer Always Loses
    J. Mark Ramseyer & Eric B. Rasmusen
     
  The Independence of the Judiciary: The Case of England
    Robert Stevens
     
  The Accountable Judge: Guardian of Judicial Independence
    Frances Kahn Zemans
     
  Judicial Independence and Article III: Too Little and Too Much
    Judith Resnik
     
  Judicial Discipline, Judicial Independence, and the Constitution: A Textual And Structural Analysis
    Martin H. Redish
     
  Do We Need An Empirical Research Agenda on Judicial Independence?
    Deborah R. Hensler
     
  Bibliography
  Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability: A Selected Bibliography
    Amy B. Atchison, Lawrence Tobe Liebert & Denise K. Russell
     
  Notes
  The Child as Apprentice: Enhancing the Child’s Ability to Participate in Custody Decisionmaking By Providing Scaffolded Instruction
    Jessica Cherry
     
  Plain English: A Reappraisal of the Intended Audience of Disclosure Under the Securities Act of 1933
    Kenneth B. Firtel
     
  Departures from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Based on Prior Dissimilar Conduct: A Call for a Finding of Relatedness
    Benjamin R. King
     
  Enabling the Mentally Disabled Employee: Binding Arbitration Under the ADA
    Heather Spragg